Posts tagged as:

usability

Social network pruning heuristic #3: Familiarity matters

by Andy DeSoto on June 15, 2008

The social network pruning series is a collection of brief articles that each cover a technique you may wish to use to keep your social networks at a more manageable size.  The last two tips were #1: Full names only and #2: Eliminate cross-posters.

Social network pruning heuristic #3: Familiarity matters

If you maintain a profile on one or more social networks, you know all too well the time it can take to keep track of your friends’ updates, shared items, and conversations.  It wouldn’t be particularly difficult to stay on top of this social news if there were 48 hours in a day, but it’s not likely that our calendar system will be changing in our favor anytime soon– as educated and intelligent computer users, our time is often more limited than our resources.

As a result of this crunch, it’s in our best interests to ensure we spend time on social networking sites efficiently.  Yesterday, blogger Chris Brogan summed this issue up nicely in a post entitled, “Are You Living Consciously Online?” In it, he asks an important question (as I’m learning all great blog articles do):

How are you spending your time online?  Are you making a difference?

It’s with this that I make my next recommendation for simplifying your social networks: removing individuals that you don’t immediately recognize or recall.

If you’ve spent a prolonged period of time on a networking site, you probably have a good idea of who the major players are in that community, as well as those that contribute meaningful content, participate actively in discussions, or post attractive vacation photos of themselves, depending on what you’re into.  This means that if you scan through your friend list, you’re more likely to recall the contacts that are most meaningful to you because you’ve spent the most time looking at their updates and name.  If you don’t recognize someone, take a look at a few of their previous posts and see if any ring a bell.  If none do, this individual may be contributing to the noise rather than the signal.

In short, use how familiar you are with a contact to judge whether or not you should remain their follower.  If it’s hard recalling anything meaningful they’ve contributed, chances are good the only thing they’ve been contributing is stress.

Just to emphasize the importance of keeping online contacts manageable, here are some great quotes from a discussion that got going on Pownce last night regarding meaningfulness on social networks.  Hopefully these two individuals won’t mind me sharing their thoughts.

Mike Lewis recommends,

“Don’t lose control when it comes to these networks. I took a step back and made myself cut the noise. Its hard but it has to be done sometimes.”

Scott Phillips also adds,

“If someone has added me on Pownce or Twitter and the media posts far outweigh the typed posts, I ditch them, especially if there is no relevancy. I add and remove all the time and I have no issues with people that remove me. It’s all part of building a community.”

Without a doubt, keeping networks in reign is one of the key requirements of keeping them enjoyable.  As these two super-users can attest, being overwhelmed by meaningless content isn’t something anyone is interested in.  Unfollowing unfamiliar individuals on networks is one technique that can help.

{ 0 comments }

Social network pruning heuristic #2: Eliminate cross-posters

by Andy DeSoto on May 27, 2008

The social network pruning series is a collection of brief articles, each covering a technique you may wish to use to prune your social networks to a more manageable size.  You can read last week’s post (#1: Full names only) by clicking here.

Social network pruning heuristic #2: Eliminate cross-posters

Considering the popularity and ubiquity of status-update social networks (e.g., Twitter, Pownce, and Facebook Status), it’s rare that users have every single one of their friends on one service alone.  Rather, most individuals likely want to keep up with, and broadcast to, friends on a number of networks.  So what do these people do?  In the interest of time, they use cross-posting tools to send the same message to a number of different services.  While these tools such as Hellotxt and SocialThing! make broadcasting a bit easier for the user, they have the unfortunate side effect of creating noise for those that follow that user.

Fortunately, the solution is simple, albeit time-consuming: take a few minutes to unfollow any individuals that repeatedly send the exact same message to a number of services.  An aggregator such as FriendFeed or SocialThing! can help determine the duplicate content perpetrators, but tracking down these individuals can be a hassle even still.

[click to continue...]

{ 14 comments }

Social network pruning heuristic #1: Full names only

by Andy DeSoto on May 20, 2008

As commenters Wayne Smallman and Heidi Cool have noted here and here, social networks can quickly get out of hand if you track individuals that are too different, too random, or too noisy. However, reducing a list of over 800 people can be a pretty daunting process unless you utilize some rules of thumb to help you along the way.

With this in mind, I present to you the first in a series of brief articles, each covering a sample heuristic you may wish to use to prune your social networks to a more manageable size.

Pruning Heuristic #1: Full Names Only

Here’s an easy idea to lose a few pounds on your favorite social networks. Stop following anyone who doesn’t provide their full name on the service of interest. Although degree of preferred privacy varies on a per-network basis, an individual who makes their full name available is exhibiting more trust, responsibility, and openness than one who doesn’t.

Use this to shorten your follow list. Of course, a user’s handle on a certain service will rarely be his or her full name, but more often than not, a little bit of sleuthing through other public profiles will reveal one’s full identity. My Twitter username is ‘kadesoto,’ for instance, but you can find my full name in my Twitter profile, not to mention other sites and services I have linked to that account.

Limiting your attention to those that you know by name has a more basic practicality to it, too: it’s simply more likely that you are connected to a greater degree to a social networking friend you know the name of rather than one you don’t. A stronger connection generally predicts a stronger interest in this friend’s activities.

(Of course, this heuristic is not to suggest that individuals concerned with privacy are unreasonable to do so.)

Apply this rule to your most bloated social network today and see what happens! Your Socialthing! feed’s ‘rename’ feature will thank you for it.

{ 5 comments }