Posts tagged as:

social networks

Social networking sites serve as counseling tools

by Andy DeSoto on June 19, 2008

A recent and interesting article to come out of Child and Adolescent Mental Health is a brief discussion of the possibilities of using social networking sites, such as MySpace, as counselings tool to engage adolescent clients.  Clemens, Shipp, and Pisarik (2008) recommend in a recent Practitioner’s Toolkit that mental health experts: a) be aware of social networking sites, and b) be knowledgeable about such sites in order to utilize these services as an occupational tool.

Summary

The amount of information that is generally shared on a social network profile, along with the interactions and encounters that take place and are digitally recorded on such sites, provide a wealth of resources at a mental health professional’s disposal for adequately meeting the needs of developing individuals.  Clemens et al. suggest two approaches for approaching this data:

  1. Use reflection on the individual’s social networking profile as ‘homework.’ If the user steps outside of his or her own perspective for a moment, what does the profile in question say about him or her?  How does a MySpace profile, for instance, shed light on the different facets of the individual’s personality?  Insights arising from this private or shared introspection may guide future sessions.
  2. Have the individual share his or her social networking profile with the professional. The writers suggest this may prompt revealing answers to certain questions such as “in what way does your online profile capture who you are?”  If the psychologist is able to remain impassive and non-judgmental through this process, such a mutual exploration can be extremely rewarding.

Clemens et al. appropriately warn of the level of trust such an openness requires and how sensitive the material posted to social networking sites can be.  The article aptly explains:

Looking over a MySpace profile together might be akin to a client handing you an invisibility cloak and inviting you to tag along on a Friday night to help them make sense of how they are acting in the presence of a group of friends.

In closing, the authors state that social networking sites such as MySpace remain an “untapped resource for mental health professionals.”  Much more work needs to be done to explore frameworks for counseling via these sites, but the benefits are potentially enormously rewarding.

Thoughts

It’s great to see mainstream psychologists utilizing the wealth of information available within social media to assist other human beings.  Although simple observations, such as the ones in this article, barely scratch the surface of the sheer amount of data on human interactions contained within these different services, it’s essays such as this Practitioner’s Toolkit entry that provide the foundation for future quantitative research.  There’s a need for psychologists to become more familiar with social media and online networks in general as more and more relationships are fostered, strengthened, or continued online.

As research continues, I suppose we’ll discover more specific causes, effects, and correlative factors between social networking personae and real-life interactions. For now, though, I’ll happily settle for foundational explorations such as this one.
ResearchBlogging.org

Clemens, E.V., Shipp, A.E., Pisarik, C.T. (2008). MySpace as a tool for mental health professionals. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 13(2), 97-98.

{ 2 comments }

Can online networks be the foundation of true relationships?

by Andy DeSoto on June 11, 2008

Two nights ago, I wrote a brief post hypothesizing that personal exchanges are what make social networks meaningful.  In the few hours since I published the article, though, I’ve already heard two carefully reasoned yet differently-angled opinions that this might not be the case.  As a follow-up, I decided to examine this topic, and these two angles, in a little more depth.

Dosh Dosh: “Less personal is no less legitimate”

Internet marketing strategist Maki shared an excellent article on relationships and online networks with me last night on Plurk.  Contrary to my opinion that personal exchange creates meaningfulness, he writes (emphasis added):

“… lifestreaming/microblogging sites like Plurk (my profile) or Twitter which allow you to meet and communicate with large groups of people from all over the world. This method of communication is less personal but its no less legitimate. In my opinion, its a form of ultra-casual, ‘light-touch’, non-invasive communication.”

In this article, he postulates that rather than being based on personal and emotional exchange, the foundation of online social networking is reciprocity, something that networks like Plurk and Twitter are excellent at facilitating.  Although they may indeed be less personal, if all that matters is ease of two-way communication, lack of serious underlying content may be no great loss for a future relationship.  This may even suggest that the actual content that is shared in an online relationship is irrelevant, at least relative to the mutual reciprocity in play.

Erin Cartaya: “Twitter is not the foundational place to make relationships”

From another angle comes eVisibility Social Media Specialist Erin Cartaya’s opinion, as left on this blog, that a service like Twitter (and probably Plurk, as well) is not capable of producing a meaningful relationship on its own.  Rather, she suggests that status-update networks like Twitter are merely a component of the gestalt of social media:

“There are many different social sites on the internet and each one is intertwined with one another. In order for you to make lasting relationships on twitter, you have to have that same interaction on Digg, Stumble, etc…. However, you have to keep in mind that each of these sites will result in different types of relationships.”

This seems to suggest that a social network devoid of personal exchange can still supplement an existing relationship as long as that personal exchange occurs in another arena.  For Erin, online relationships are first based on real-life exchanges, but as we’ve discussed on another popular post on this blog, not all relationships necessarily are.

A compromise?

This post has covered three opinions on what makes a strong online relationship: personal exchange, reciprocity, and an existing foundation outside of the network of interest.  It’s quite possible that all three of these elements may contribute to the creation and maintenance of true relationships, as none of the three are particularly mutually exclusive.  A user’s experience with others on a social network can only be as strong as the weakest of these three building blocks; a lack of personal communication, reciprocity imbalance, or shaky foundation alone is enough to detract from the social networking experience.

Share your wisdom

Of course, these opinions are far from conclusive.  What are your own personal thoughts about what makes a strong online relationship?  Agree or disagree with any of these thoughts?  Have something else to share?  I’d love to hear from you.

If you enjoyed this post, you may want to read Erin’s post on a similar topic here, take a look at the related links below this article, or subscribe to free RSS updates or e-mail updates.

{ 0 comments }

Other social networks to try besides Facebook

by Andy DeSoto on May 29, 2008

My blog feed passes by a captive audience of my Facebook friends every time I publish a new post.  To many of us, Facebook is the first social network we became involved in and it’s the one we stay most active in, too.  However, it doesn’t necessarily need to be this way; there are plenty of other social networks and utilities out there that provide great opportunities, as well.  This post is intended for friends that might be unfamiliar with some of the other networks out there, but if you’re a seasoned pro, please chime in and add your own thoughts too!

If you enjoy keeping up with your friends and discovering new websites, videos, and photos through Facebook, here’s a list of four other networks you might like to take a look at.  I’ve written up a short description of each and rated them, on a one to five scale, on ease of use, time commitment, and community friendliness from the perspective of a Facebook user.

Twitter

One of the most popular networks out there, Twitter is essentially a distilled Facebook Status that continually asks the question, “What are you doing?”  Twitter users answer this question in a variety of ways and in varying detail, ranging from giving simple descriptions of what was for dinner to transmitting the text of an entire novel.  This utility might not seem too groundbreaking at first, but, as most of the community can attest to, it gets addictive, fast.  Sign up for an account,  update every once in a while, and get some friends on the service, and you’ll start spending much less time on Facebook.

[click to continue...]

{ 3 comments }